Starlinks have been in elliptical orbit since May 2019 - APPARENTLY ALSO GOING THROUGH AN INTENSIVE LEARNING CURVE WHICH HAS QUADRUPLED POTENTIAL RADIATION EXPOSURES AND SHOWS US THAT THE POWERS IN THE USA WILL DROP ANY HURDLES TO FIND 'SUCCESS' OVER THE BACK OF A HEALTHY PLANET! The FCC basically green lighted the approval process without any consideration of human health and the environment in spite of the vastly growing body of scientific literature that shows that EMF is cancerous, mutagenic, and creates a multitude of devastating symptoms in essential terrestrial and aquatic vertebrates' bio-electromagnetic systems; including but not limited to to the endocrine, the heart, the brain, and the respiration systems. The physicists that are involved in doing this technology somehow overlook (for their short term benefit) the quantum biophysics that has been evolved and honed with many environmental constraints for over 3.8 billion years! Doing a simple Einsteinian thought experiment using data gleaned from the Web. There are currently 40 Starlink satellites (at the time of this publication) which are to be initially elliptically circling Earth in a minimum orbit of a mere 174 miles (after full setup they are slated to be between 689 & 823 miles according to FCC application BUT THERE HAS BEEN A CHANGE TO THEIR PROPOSAL BECAUSE OF TOO MUCH LATENCY SO HALVING THE ORIGINAL ORBIT DISTANCE THEREBY THE LATENCY ISSUE THUS NECESSITATING FEWER SATELLITES CONSEQUENTLY SOMEWHAT REDUCING SPACE DEBRIS) with a maximum transmitter power of 20KW. I chose an up to 11.7 GHz signal (it could be most any between 10.7-30 GHz at this time, but I still kept it at the low end of 5G). The radiation from the current satellite transmitters are well above the FCC power limit as evidenced using a a low cost spectrum analyzer and by calculations below, while Space Explorations LLC is showing self-contradictory power levels of over the FCC limit -3 decibels very close to actual measurements and under the limit -116 decibels in their recent after-the-fact technical documentation, which a solitary engineer merely signed off on (an employee of the LLC really?)https://www.scribd.com/document/437458206/technical-attachment?secret_password=0EWZ8KGbCk8YKiZpbW45#download&from_embed (see below in Blog)
"As part of the Starlink mega-constellation project,Elon Musk and SpaceX want 42,000 micro-satellites to be orbiting Earth" Starlinks have been in elliptical orbit since May 2019 - APPARENTLY ALSO GOING THROUGH AN INTENSIVE LEARNING CURVE WHICH HAS QUADRUPLED POTENTIAL RADIATION EXPOSURES AND SHOWS US THAT THE POWERS IN THE USA WILL DROP ANY HURDLES TO FIND 'SUCCESS' OVER THE BACK OF A HEALTHY PLANET! The FCC basically green lighted the approval process without any consideration of human health and the environment in spite of the vastly growing body of scientific literature that shows that EMF is cancerous, mutagenic, and creates a multitude of devastating symptoms in essential terrestrial and aquatic vertebrates' bio-electromagnetic systems; including but not limited to to the endocrine, the heart, the brain, and the respiration systems. The physicists that are involved in doing this technology somehow overlook (for their short term benefit) the quantum biophysics that has been evolved and honed with many environmental constraints for over 3.8 billion years! Doing a simple Einsteinian thought experiment using data gleaned from the Web. There are currently 40 Starlink satellites (at the time of this publication) which are to be initially elliptically circling Earth in a minimum orbit of a mere 174 miles (after full setup they are slated to be between 689 & 823 miles according to FCC application BUT THERE HAS BEEN A CHANGE TO THEIR PROPOSAL BECAUSE OF TOO MUCH LATENCY SO HALVING THE ORIGINAL ORBIT DISTANCE THEREBY THE LATENCY ISSUE THUS NECESSITATING FEWER SATELLITES CONSEQUENTLY SOMEWHAT REDUCING SPACE DEBRIS) with a maximum transmitter power of 20KW. I chose an up to 11.7 GHz signal (it could be most any between 10.7-30 GHz at this time, but I still kept it at the low end of 5G). The radiation from the current satellite transmitters are well above the FCC power limit as evidenced using a a low cost spectrum analyzer and by calculations below, while Space Explorations LLC is showing self-contradictory power levels of over the FCC limit -3 decibels very close to actual measurements and under the limit -116 decibels in their recent after-the-fact technical documentation, which a solitary engineer merely signed off on (an employee of the LLC really?)https://www.scribd.com/document/437458206/technical-attachment?secret_password=0EWZ8KGbCk8YKiZpbW45#download&from_embed (see below in Blog) Functional model of satellite positions and paths as draw with Matlab showing face of geode Functional model of satellite positions and paths as draw with Matlab showing bisected geode A 3-D model of satellite numbers, positions and paths as draw with Matlab bi-polar view A 3-D model of satellite numbers, positions and paths as draw with Matlab bi-polar view The lower diagram above shows a more accurate representation of the power of beam at -3 dB-later in the signed full 102 page Technical Document Attachment A it shows a sharp cut off of power above -116 dBm with no explanations of how power reductions are enforced so FCC emissions are met.. (Above left) Cell fitting of elliptical beam with both the at 40+ and 32 degree latitudes ellipses using the same 20.22 square Kilometer cell size proposed for between 60 north and south latitudes. (No such clarification was made for the polar regions above and below 60 degrees having any different cell size to reduce cell density with the shrinking latitudinal diameters-see the 2 sets of 4 satellite orbital placement geode models above ) What a larger 20.22 square mile cell size on X-Map 3-D & 2-D side by side GIS program in the Temecula/Murrieta area The same approximate area is covered by 7-20.22 square KM cells making a hive into a super hexagon comb. How an area in this case an open area in a subdivision is covered by 7 small cells as an example of hexagonal tessellation even a remote area can have 5G internet coverage-Star link's goal is global coverage. Musk has FCC's permission to have >11,000 more satellites. Above a Space X test of the booster system for the Starlight Satellites at the center of the future Temecula/Murrieta cell. Below I used the Rhode & Schwartz Applet to estimate the maximum power that can be realistically generated and beamed down to the Earth's surface to be received by a human antenna (as opposed to the standard 50 ohm of my spectrum analyzers). Immediately below is the expected future orbits and below that is the immediate orbits- somewhere in between should lie the current power. Then I used Franck Delpino's Applet to convert this power data into units that one may measure using my readily available cheap Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) Spectrum Analyzers for the thought experiment's quick verification. Now I am already familiar with some of this new RF shown below coincidentally starting shortly after the launch of these satellites since last May simply because of my continuous monitoring and data logging the entire Microwave spectrum by using dozens of these spectrum analyzers, thus it's no problem speculating that such a signal which I only started finding this summer at my current location in SW California, must be from Starlink as it lies halfway from the expected power level! Does anyone have another more reasonable explanation? This reading at 11.995 GHz. is also above my standards of safety and there is very little most people can protect themselves. It's become time to hire a pro and change the FCC licensing process. At RF Site Evaluations my health expert, Rebecca Heisler, MA-LMFT recommends anything below -85 dBm whereas the current FCC standard for a single emitter device with antenna at 6 GHz is -53 dBm-see below how this works out with multiple emitters today. I just happened to be 2/3 of the way through Stephen Jay Gould's Magus Opus: The Structure of Evolutionary Theory when I came across a pertinent reason why Scientists do not give in to the latest Science quickly rather it can take 50 or more years as people's reputation during their life have to be appeased by sticking to their guns. Here is a cogent excerpt from this tome. This sub heading starts at the bottom of page 1032. Here is the final FCC order allowing Elon Musk to radiate our planet endangering humans from space all for profit
0 Comments
even before our prior addiction to personal transportation and it's inadvertent cause of long term disastrous weather conditions AKA extinctifying climate changeAutomobiles tie these two phenomenon together as drive-train power-plants exhausting greenhouse gases now are coupled with networked post 2016 model year Electronic Control Units (ECUs) communicating with sensors, other ECUs and other autos using wireless Troposphere heating microwave radiation. Science now has firmly established both forms of vehicular emissions as quick road toward our demise with the NTP studies' conclusion of wide ranging mammalian toxicity including geno-toxicity within the current FCC's sub-optical radiation emission power level standards. It seems that Newtonian physics has yet to evolve to quantum physics at the action level and so the old Newtonian experts hold still more sway with the FCC and the courts because the new explanations seem to go against our slower evolving instincts of what can be dangerous or not. Below shows the power of big money of the Telecom world over science in the captured FCC, FDA, and EPA regulatory agencies of our government.. |
AuthorMark Taylor is concerned with the unprecedented proliferation (>4 magnitudes in <7 years) of sub-optical levels of anthropogenic radio frequency (RF) radiation which severely impact the health of all life forms on Earth. This is even more dangerous than second hand cigarette smoke - perhaps as dangerous as lead poisoning was at the time of the fall of the Roman Empire. CategoriesArchives
April 2022
|