Notice the middle scale -the heat map has very little yellow -why? because the 3 solar installations sharing the same secondary have not switched on because they have not met their power producing thresholds(~16VDC) -thus their DC/AC inverters are not yet online leaving only the ubiquitous AC/DC switching power supplies that most often create the small amount of dirty power sans residential solar -the cure is to require residential solar to have active harmonic filters like large solar installations are starting to have (or be required to have). Just take a look at this heat map in other powerline harmonic pictures I have posted -if there is very little yellow (power) there is almost always very little solar! This dirty electricity sometimes known by the acronym EMF (electro-magnetic fluctuations) can also create health problems and this may often be the cause of yours. Read the articles below on some of the dangers.
By Jeffrey Mark Taylor Notice the middle scale -the heat map has very little yellow -why? because the 3 solar installations sharing the same secondary have not switched on because they have not met their power producing thresholds(~16VDC) -thus their DC/AC inverters are not yet online leaving only the ubiquitous AC/DC switching power supplies that most often create the small amount of dirty power sans residential solar -the cure is to require residential solar to have active harmonic filters like large solar installations are starting to have (or be required to have). Just take a look at this heat map in other powerline harmonic pictures I have posted -if there is very little yellow (power) there is almost always very little solar! This dirty electricity sometimes known by the acronym EMF (electro-magnetic fluctuations) can also create health problems and this may often be the cause of yours. Read the articles below on some of the dangers.
0 Comments
By Jeffrey Mark Taylor
Who knows (I have provided the square root harmonic of 57.237 Hz below the cube root for your own curiosity)? Typical condo meter shed 8 gas & 9 electric smart meters total of 26 transceivers (18E & 8G) grounded to gas pipes 9 electric meters with 2 transceivers - 2 antennas each located where the writing starts above the LCD display FCC zones of permissible distances from 1 transceiver antenna-each antenna has 2 lobes extending safe limit to >1M horizontally & >0.7M vertically The "X" shows where each set Local/Home Area Network (HAN/LAN) of transceiver antennas are located Overlap of public non-permissible area for just LAN transceiver operating @ 900MHz rulers at top of blog page show that the transceiver antennas are less than 1 cm from condo service all sharing the same utility transformer Above shows near antennas or wires one can be exposed to nearly 75x the allowed MPE. Below shows that 6 feet away from wires or antennas one finally reaches exposure levels within the FCC MPE. Note I have upgraded this FCC MPE% estimator to 18 antennas and coverage for a more typical 15 x 15 foot room that is often surrounded by power cabling that act as antenna within 100 feet of these meters leaving many owners vulnerable to just 1 "smart" meter. More details of these antenna locations and other features included in these meters inc. fire prone disconnect Because the 26 transceiver antennas are so close to conductors leading in the condo (1.53458333 centimeters), the FCC unsafe area now extends along all the pipes and conductors (at albeit somewhat lower levels called distance losses, cable losses and other attenuations by FCC) from the formula: Power Density = P/4Πr2 where r= the distance in meters from the antenna to conductor such that a 1 watt transceiver will be de-rated to~ 0.9 watts while the conductor as antenna will be de-rated (attenuated) depending on the human's dielectric characteristics who is receiving the signals and the impedance of the conductor carrying the signal into the condo. Adding to the power however realize there are 25 other transceivers all connected to the same conductors- thus figuring for instance reading in bed, using a hair dryer in the bathroom or turning up the water heater in the laundry room to take a shower you would close the distance to the source well within the 20cm minimum distance limit for a violation. Essentially it becomes easily possible to exceed the the FCC's maximum permitted exposure (MPE) to radio frequency radiation (RFR) for the (unassuming) public during the requisite 30 minute long testing period as mandated in such a residence where the average distance to a RFR source is less than a meter already. This condo's room by room random mean time spent graphic immediately below demonstrates that when an occupant spends their time in the bedroom and the office of this condo, this occupant certainly averaged less than the critical 1 meter distance when considering the fact that the office desk chair and bed were either close or adjoining the condo's wall conductors and even when in the kitchen or living room, the occupant was also likely less than 1 meter because the kitchen counter and the TV/stereo chairs were close to the condo's wall wiring. This makes it more reasonable than not to conclude the occupant was illegally exposed radio frequency radiation levels unknowingly by the utility's knowingly endangering co-location smart meter installation from the point of its installation thereon in time. Unfortunately time and time again when such an occupant may claim to their utility they are being hurt by this sort of installation, rather the utility disagrees and claims this is impossible, while refusing to correct or even to partially mitigate their customer's exposure levels -- instead falsely claiming that the public utility commission has approved and mandated the installation. Finally considering the FCC safety limits are purely based on 1950s thermal exposure limits and do not consider any of the lower limits of safety that were known also to exist in the 1950s and have now been proven by over 20,000 independent scientific studies to cause early death, maiming, and debilitating injuries since. Why is it then that these facts continue to be buried by misleading research and fake news? My only explanation is that It seems that our government is less interested in protecting individuals anymore rather it's vastly more protective of the corporations' profits that keep all of the government officials in office instead to the point of even ignoring the decades' old thermal health and safety standards that where promulgated before the corporations usurped our inalienable rights. 1 Electric meter's transceivers-note MPE violation occurs @<30cm from conductor/antenna Heat map of condo above shows ground floor occupancy duration pattern of occupant. The heat map below shows it integrated with additional radiation coming from only the closest of the adjoining buildings with an additional 26 transceivers -- Note there are 6 adjoining equivalent buildings that are not included, but they also share same transformer winding. This means the occupant is actually exposed to radiation from a total of 208 smart meter transceivers through coupling conduction from proximity to the unshielded meter antennas. FCC's MPE Excel Calculator for up to 5 antennas within 90 square centimeters Using AirSpy Hardware with Yagi 100KHz-300GHz antenna and SDR# software
By Jeffrey Mark Taylor Please also notice that last year's toxicology study actually shows a statistical significance of brain and heart cancer risk from intermittent daily whole body exposures of GSM & CDMA cell phone radiation exposures for 20 months @ 1.5 watts/kilogram (below the current SAR standards promulgated by the FCC in the 1980's). For some reason (see npt fact sheet for some pros & cons) the FCC remains reluctant to change these standards in light of this study's recommendation to do so based on caution, as other European societies have done since as early as the 1950's. Perhaps it will require a US court case where the jury award's damages for wrongful death against a cell phone manufacturer awarded to the relatives of that individual for the FCC to connect the dots and realize that our low power electrochemical bodies do not require only heat or ionization to be impaired. Such a change may be inconvenient to our increasingly wireless dependent society, but we should at least consider making this change before such a death is court proven. Again, (see side bar at top of blog) this is also like 2nd hand smoke, as it affects us all whether we use wireless or not and our government continues to allow this to go on. I heard from a reliable source that OET56E3 (17 pages), which is available by googling 'Questions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields' may be an incomplete updated draft of E4 (38 pages). My feeling (since there is no publication date or title page) is that E3 must be an aborted draft of OET56 composed around 1990 which was superseded by OET56E4 (noting that edition 3 should come before edition 4, E3's vast incompleteness and the fact there are no dates newer than 1989 referenced within E3). Too bad the wording of OET56E3 (as far as it covers is more cautionary) was not used in the OET56E4 (the probable most current version). E4 thus shows some back sliding as far as human safety goes-the opposite of what the toxicology study recommends. I also searched on FCC’s publication site ‘Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 56’ reverse date order 8670 entries, 867 pages and found nothing on the subject until September 2, 1999 page 66, entry 669 -Questions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields OET56E4-there was no E3 or for that matter any earlier entry back to 1936. Thus the FCC has lost any record of the date of OET56E3 unless I spend the time to searching the remaining 8000 entries to find out that this reliable source is in fact correct after-all.
|
AuthorMark Taylor is concerned with the unprecedented proliferation (>4 magnitudes in <7 years) of sub-optical levels of anthropogenic radio frequency (RF) radiation which severely impact the health of all life forms on Earth. This is even more dangerous than second hand cigarette smoke - perhaps as dangerous as lead poisoning was at the time of the fall of the Roman Empire. CategoriesArchives
April 2022
|